(1) August 1973 & 1998 'On the Cover' (August 2023) The two part match report by GM Leonid Shamkovich started in the July 1998 issue of Chess Life and ended in August 1998. Since I gave the full introduction to the first part of the report in the August 'On the Cover', I'll repeat only the first paragraph of that intro here:-
Two outstanding young grandmasters, [Kramnik and Shirov], crossed chess swords in the best of 10 World Chess Council (WCC) World Championship candidates' match. The match started May 24 and finished June 5 in the small Spanish city of Cazorla, in Andalusia. Alexei Shirov, who won the match with a score of 5.5-3.5, will meet Garry Kasparov in October for the WCC World Championship.
The rest of the report included annotations for all nine games of the match. GM Shamkovich, after commenting on the ninth game, closed the article saying,
This game turned out to be a final brilliant ending to a relatively dull duel.
An inline text box accompanying the article added,
The World Chess Council (WCC) World Championship Match between defending champion Garry Kasparov and challenger Alexei Shirov will begin October 16 in Seville, Spain. Besides the WCC title, $1.9 million will be on the line, with $1.235 million to the winner and $665,000 to the loser. We will pass along more information on the match as it becomes available.
All in all, largely because the Kasparov - Shirov match was never played, the 1998 Shirov - Kramnik match must be one of the most neglected high-level matches in chess history.
(2) July 1973 & 1998 'On the Cover' (July 2023) The post provided some background and introduced an important historical speech by (then) FIDE World Champion Karpov.
Karpov's presence in Las Vegas [for the National Open] was explained in the story '1998 National Open, Part II: "A Really Big Shew"' by Jerry Hanken. A sidebar to the story, titled 'Karpov Speaks', started [...]
Karpov's speech covered many topics relevant to the World Championship in the last decades of the 1900s. Following are the sidebar's bullets (in bold text) and its main points. There is much more of historical value behind the '[...]s'.
-
Karpov on his trip to America to play in San Antonio:
"I remember 1972, my
second trip to the U.S. (The first was to Puerto Rico for
the Student Team Championship in 1971.) 1972 was a
serious tournament which happened in November.
Fischer and Spassky had played in the summer, and
when I came through New York in November it was not
possible to buy a chess set or book, because all America
was crazy for chess and all books and sets had been
sold.
[...]
-
Karpov on meetings with Fischer:
"My first meeting was actually in San Antonio. He was
invited by Bill Church, and was to appear at the last
round. He was, as usual, late. So the organizers didn't
want to start the round. He came and greeted all the
people and grandmasters, and then he disappeared
almost immediately."
[...]
-
Karpov [on] later meetings with Fischer:
"Even after '75 we met three times. At the
meeting in Washington in 1977, we were very close to
signing a contract and agreement to play a match. All
the problems were solved. We already had pens in our
hands to sign, and then Fischer said, 'OK, we play. We
agree to everything but one point. The match should be
called ...'
[...]
-
Karpov on Kasparov:
Karpov disputed Kasparov's contention
that the Fischer - Spassky
match of 1992 was an amateur level match. He thinks
some of the games were
quite good and could rank
in the top ten games of 1992.
[...]
Also:
Kasparov's claim to be World Champion,
Kasparov's claim that Karpov was not a legitimate World Champion, and
a private match with Kasparov.
-
Karpov on the last [1997] FIDE Championships:
Anatoly noted the criticism (which
came from some American magazines) of his entering
the matches at the end.
[...]
- Karpov on the future of chess: 'For [chess] to be in the Olympic Games would be very good. Chess is not a sport in every country, and you can get much better support from sponsors and official organizations [once you are part of the official Olympics]. [...]
Wouldn't it be enlightening to have the full transcript of the talk? I suppose it is lost to us forever.